Search Research instruments Questionnaires Scale search Scale

Scale: Processes on internal evaluation

Related constructMaßnahmen der Qualitätsentwicklung

Theoretical allocation in original studySchool evaluation/Use/

OriginOwn development

SourceCore 6 Development ,

CitationKuger, S.; Jude, N.; Klieme, E.; Kaplan, D. (2016). Processes on internal evaluation - Schulleitung [Fragebogenskala: Version 1.0]. In: Programme for International Student Assessment (2015) - Fragebogenerhebung Chapter 04 - Field Trial (PISA 2015) [Skalenkollektion: Version 1.0]. Datenerhebung 2014. Frankfurt am Main: Forschungsdatenzentrum Bildung am DIPF. http://dx.doi.org/10.7477/150:0:1

Theoretical background--

Target groupPrincipal

Time Period of Data Collection2014

NotesInternal school evaluation: Evaluation as part of a process controlled by a school in which the school defines which areas are judged; the evaluation may be conducted by members of the school or by persons/institutions commissioned by the school.

Release date30.06.2020

Number of items9

IntroductionThinking about the last internal evaluation in your school. Do the following statements apply?
Please select one response in each row.
If you need further explanation of the term “internal school evaluation”, please use the help button.

Items

Item text	Mean value	Standard deviation	Accuracy
We clearly defined criteria prior to evaluation.	1.11	0.31	--
We derive evaluation criteria from our school’s educational goals.	1.08	0.27	--
The results of internal evaluations led to changes in school policies.	1.20	0.40	--
We used the results of internal evaluations to draw up clearly defined measures.	1.10	0.30	--
We used the data to plan specific action for school development.	1.09	0.28	--
We used the data to plan specific action for the improvement of teaching.	1.09	0.28	--
We put measures derived from the results of internal evaluations into practice promptly.	1.22	0.41	--
The impetus triggered by the internal evaluation “disappeared” very quickly at our school.	1.78	0.41	--
The effects triggered by the internal evaluation “disappeared” very quickly at our school.	1.81	0.39	--

Response category

Value	Meaning
1	Yes
2	No

StudyPISA - Programme for International Student Assessment (2015)

Files

Scale: Processes on internal evaluation

Related constructMaßnahmen der Qualitätsentwicklung

Theoretical allocation in original studySchool evaluation/Use/

OriginOwn development

SourceCore 6 Development ,

CitationKuger, S.; Jude, N.; Klieme, E.; Kaplan, D. (2016). Processes on internal evaluation - Schulleitung [Fragebogenskala: Version 1.0]. In: Programme for International Student Assessment (2015) - Fragebogenerhebung Chapter 04 - Field Trial (PISA 2015) [Skalenkollektion: Version 1.0]. Datenerhebung 2014. Frankfurt am Main: Forschungsdatenzentrum Bildung am DIPF. http://dx.doi.org/10.7477/150:0:1

Theoretical background--

Target groupPrincipal

Time Period of Data Collection2014

NotesInternal school evaluation: Evaluation as part of a process controlled by a school in which the school defines which areas are judged; the evaluation may be conducted by members of the school or by persons/institutions commissioned by the school.

Release date30.06.2020

Number of items9

IntroductionThinking about the last internal evaluation in your school. Do the following statements apply?
Please select one response in each row.
If you need further explanation of the term “internal school evaluation”, please use the help button.

Items

Item text	Mean value	Standard deviation	Accuracy
We clearly defined criteria prior to evaluation.	1.11	0.31	--
We derive evaluation criteria from our school’s educational goals.	1.08	0.27	--
The results of internal evaluations led to changes in school policies.	1.20	0.40	--
We used the results of internal evaluations to draw up clearly defined measures.	1.10	0.30	--
We used the data to plan specific action for school development.	1.09	0.28	--
We used the data to plan specific action for the improvement of teaching.	1.09	0.28	--
We put measures derived from the results of internal evaluations into practice promptly.	1.22	0.41	--
The impetus triggered by the internal evaluation “disappeared” very quickly at our school.	1.78	0.41	--
The effects triggered by the internal evaluation “disappeared” very quickly at our school.	1.81	0.39	--

Response category

Value	Meaning
1	Yes
2	No

StudyPISA - Programme for International Student Assessment (2015)

Files

Scale: Processes on internal evaluation

Related constructMaßnahmen der Qualitätsentwicklung

Theoretical allocation in original studySchool evaluation/Use/

OriginOwn development

SourceCore 6 Development ,

CitationKuger, S.; Jude, N.; Klieme, E.; Kaplan, D. (2016). Processes on internal evaluation - Schulleitung [Fragebogenskala: Version 1.0]. In: Programme for International Student Assessment (2015) - Fragebogenerhebung Chapter 04 - Field Trial (PISA 2015) [Skalenkollektion: Version 1.0]. Datenerhebung 2014. Frankfurt am Main: Forschungsdatenzentrum Bildung am DIPF. http://dx.doi.org/10.7477/150:0:1

Theoretical background--

Target groupPrincipal

Time Period of Data Collection2014

NotesInternal school evaluation: Evaluation as part of a process controlled by a school in which the school defines which areas are judged; the evaluation may be conducted by members of the school or by persons/institutions commissioned by the school.

Release date30.06.2020

Number of items9

IntroductionThinking about the last internal evaluation in your school. Do the following statements apply?
Please select one response in each row.
If you need further explanation of the term “internal school evaluation”, please use the help button.

Items

Item text	Mean value	Standard deviation	Accuracy
We clearly defined criteria prior to evaluation.	1.11	0.31	--
We derive evaluation criteria from our school’s educational goals.	1.08	0.27	--
The results of internal evaluations led to changes in school policies.	1.20	0.40	--
We used the results of internal evaluations to draw up clearly defined measures.	1.10	0.30	--
We used the data to plan specific action for school development.	1.09	0.28	--
We used the data to plan specific action for the improvement of teaching.	1.09	0.28	--
We put measures derived from the results of internal evaluations into practice promptly.	1.22	0.41	--
The impetus triggered by the internal evaluation “disappeared” very quickly at our school.	1.78	0.41	--
The effects triggered by the internal evaluation “disappeared” very quickly at our school.	1.81	0.39	--

Response category

Value	Meaning
1	Yes
2	No

StudyPISA - Programme for International Student Assessment (2015)

Files