DE | EN
Logo fdz-Bildung
Search Research instruments Questionnaires Scale search Scale

Scale: Science-specific resources

Related constructElternarbeit

Theoretical allocation in original studySchool learning environment

OriginSelf-developed scale

SourceCore 6 Development ,

CitationKuger, S.; Jude, N.; Klieme, E.; Kaplan, D. (2016). Science-specific resources - Schulleitung [Fragebogenskala: Version 1.0]. In: Programme for International Student Assessment (2015) - Fragebogenerhebung Chapter 04 - Field Trial (PISA 2015) [Skalenkollektion: Version 1.0]. Datenerhebung 2014. Frankfurt am Main: Forschungsdatenzentrum Bildung am DIPF. http://dx.doi.org/10.7477/150:0:1

Theoretical background--

Target groupPrincipal

Time Period of Data Collection2014

Release date30.06.2020

Number of items8

Statistical value

Cronbachs AlphaMean valueStandard deviationSample size
0.712.571.341176

IntroductionWhich of the following is true for the science department of your school?
Please select one response in each row.

Items

Item textMean valueStandard deviationAccuracy
Compared to other departments, our school‘s [school science department] is well equipped. 1.280.450.51
If we ever have some extra funding, a big share goes into improvement of our [school science] teaching. 1.530.500.22
[School science] teachers are among our best educated staff members. 1.360.480.23
Compared to similar schools, we have a well equipped laboratory. 1.360.480.55
The material for hands-on activities in [school science] is in good shape. 1.220.410.52
We have enough laboratory material that all courses can regularly use it. 1.350.480.52
We have extra laboratory staff that helps support [school science] teaching. 1.580.490.33
Our school spends extra money on up-to-date [school science] equipment. 1.490.500.40

Response category

ValueMeaning
1Yes
2No

StudyPISA - Programme for International Student Assessment (2015)

SurveyFragebogenerhebung (Skalenkollektion): Chapter 04 - Field Trial (PISA 2015)



Imprint | Privacy Policy | Accessibility | BITV-Feedback | © 2022 DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education